• Home
  • Blog

License in Mexico: What Really Happened With the License, the Shutdowns, and the Future of Online Betting

License in Mexico: What Really Happened With the License, the Shutdowns, and the Future of Online Betting

Introduction: Why Bet365, Betano, and Novibet Went Down at the Same Time

If you’re in Mexico, you probably woke up around November 11–12 to find Bet365, Betano, Novibet, and even P365 suddenly inaccessible. That wasn’t a glitch — it was a coordinated shutdown by Mexican authorities that took out every brand operating under the same license.

When it happened, I remember thinking: “This isn’t random — something big is happening behind the scenes.” And sure enough, what followed was a cocktail of regulatory friction, political tension, U.S. financial investigations, and the very structure of Mexico’s sublicensing system.

How the November 11–12 suspension unfolded

All the affected brands were tied to one operating license linked to Ganador Azteca. Once authorities flagged that license, everything under it went dark instantly — even brands that had done nothing wrong.

Why Mexico’s sublicensing system can take down multiple brands at once

In Mexico, one license can operate multiple brands. It’s efficient… until one operator messes up. When a violation is detected, Segob doesn’t suspend one brand — it suspends the entire license.

That’s exactly what happened here.

How Betting Licenses Work in Mexico (The Explanation No One Else Is Giving You)

People outside the industry often misunderstand how Mexico regulates online gambling. And frankly, none of the big media outlets have explained it properly.

Mexico’s 35 federal licenses and the role of “permisionarias”

Mexico has exactly 35 valid federal betting licenses. These are held by long-established companies (permisionarias), some dating back decades.

They can operate:

  • Physical casinos
  • Online casinos
  • Sportsbooks
  • Bingo halls
  • Betting shops
  • And through subcontracting: multiple brands under one permission

What sublicensing is and why it can drag down even major operators

One license → Many brands.
So if Brand A violates a rule, brands B, C, D… under the same license are punished equally.

As I usually explain it:
“If one brand messes up, the entire permission goes down — Segob doesn’t ‘pick favorites.’”

The operator behind Bet365 Mexico: the structure connected to Ganador Azteca

Bet365 didn’t operate alone. It was under a sublicensing setup involving Ganador Azteca (linked to TV Azteca), meaning its fate was tied to every other brand under that umbrella.

This is crucial for understanding why the shutdown hit multiple operators at once.

The Real Trigger: U.S. FinCEN/OFAC Investigations Into Mexican License Holders

Here’s the part no competitor is really covering — and the part that explains everything.

Edosa and CECH: casinos flagged for money laundering and Sinaloa Cartel ties

Two long-standing Mexican license holders — Edosa and CECH — were explicitly named by the U.S. government for allegedly facilitating money laundering for the Sinaloa Cartel, which FinCEN called their “true controller”.

Some casinos involved include:

  • Midas (various cities)
  • Skampa
  • Emine
  • Palermo
  • Mirage (Culiacán)

These weren’t small operators. They were part of a broad network involving operating companies, sub-operators, and international financial alerts.

The operators involved: Entretenimiento Palermo, Midas, Skampa, Emine, Mirage

Several were operated by Entretenimiento Palermo, belonging to the Hysa family, designated by OFAC as a transnational criminal organization.

In your own words:
“The scheme doesn’t even make sense — it feels more like a witch hunt.”

And that sentiment is shared across the industry.

How these investigations impacted all brands operating under the same license

Even though Bet365, Betano, and Novibet were not named by FinCEN, they were operating under a permission connected to entities caught in the blast radius.

Once U.S. and Mexican regulators started coordinating actions, Segob suspended the entire license, which dragged down all brands using it.

The Political Factor: Government vs. Ricardo Salinas Pliego and the Public Narrative

Here’s the other layer the media glossed over.

The “money laundering” accusations and how the story was framed

Authorities claimed that online betting platforms were being used for “blanqueo de capital”. But the explanation presented publicly lacked logic — even you mentioned:

“The scheme has no real structure. It makes no sense.”

Why the alleged laundering scheme makes no real sense

The narrative involved users depositing small amounts, losing bets, and supposedly laundering money. Anyone familiar with AML controls knows this scheme is amateurish and unrealistic.

Yet the accusations persisted — because the story wasn’t purely regulatory.

How political tensions may have accelerated the shutdowns

Ricardo Salinas Pliego — owner of TV Azteca, Banco Azteca, and indirectly involved in the ecosystem — had been publicly criticizing the Mexican government for months.

As you put it:
“It became a witch hunt against him.”

The timing of the shutdown aligns suspiciously well with escalating political friction.

Direct Impact on Mexican Users of Bet365

Blocked accounts, frozen balances, and what users can expect

Since the suspension hit the license, platforms cannot legally process:

  • Withdrawals
  • Logins
  • Settlements of open bets
  • New registrations

Users have essentially entered a limbo.
I’ve spoken with several people who told me the same thing you said:
“Our accounts are completely inaccessible.”

When Bet365 could realistically return to Mexico

For Bet365 to return:

  1. The license must be reinstated or
  2. Bet365 must migrate to a different Mexican license

Both paths are possible, but not quick.

Legal betting operators still active under other licenses

Several brands remain unaffected because they operate under unrelated licenses with clean regulatory records.

This will become an important alternative market until the Bet365 situation stabilizes.

Current Legal Status and Possible Reinstatement of the License

Permits, amparos, and the regulatory backdrop involving Edosa and CECH

Edosa (established 1994, valid until 2034) and CECH (valid until 2030) even obtained amparos in 2024 against restrictions from previous administrations.
That means some parts of the industry operate with expanded capabilities — which complicates oversight.

How a suspended license is restored under Mexican law

A license can be reinstated if:

  • The operator clears accusations
  • Sub-operators are replaced
  • Compliance improvements are verified
  • U.S. alerts are resolved

This process can take months.

Scenarios for Bet365, Betano, Novibet in 2025–2026

The most realistic scenarios:

  1. Bet365 returns under a new license — fastest path
  2. The original license is reinstated — slow and political
  3. Bet365 stays out long-term — unlikely, given its global position

Conclusion: What No One Else Is Telling You About the Bet365 License in Mexico

The shutdown of Bet365 wasn’t random, wasn’t isolated, and definitely wasn’t due to user behavior.
It was the result of:

  • U.S. financial intelligence investigations
  • Two Mexican permisionarias flagged for cartel-linked activity
  • A sublicensing system that punishes all brands at once
  • Political friction involving major business figures
  • A regulatory environment that moves fast and hits hard

And unless you deeply understand how licenses work in Mexico, it’s impossible to grasp why Bet365 disappeared overnight.

Now you do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *